Competent analysis is not only about understanding statistics, but about implementing the correct statistical approach or method. In this brief article I will showcase some common statistical blunders that we generally make and how to avoid them.
To make this information simple and consumable I have divided these errors into two parts:
- Data Visualization Errors
- Statistical Blunders Galore
Data Visualization Errors
This is one nightmare-inducing area to both the presenter as well as the audience. Incorrect data presentation can skew the inference and can leave the interpretation at the mercy of the audience.
Pie charts are considered to be the best graph when you want to show how the categorical values are broken. However, they can be seriously deceptive or misleading. Below are some quick points to remember when looking at the Pie Charts:
- Percentages should add up to 100%
- 3D fits better in VR consoles than in pie charts
- Thou shall not have ‘Other’ – Beware of the slices with ‘Other’. If that is larger than the rest of the slices, you have a problem, because it makes the pie chart vague
- Show the total number of reported categories to determine how big is the pie
Bar graphs are great graphs to show the categorical data by the number or percent for a particular group. Points to consider when examining a Bar Graph:
- Thou shall have right scale: Scale made very small to make the graph look big or severe
- Consider the units being represented by the height of the bar and what it means as a result in terms of those units
A time chart is used to show how the measurable quantities change by time.
- Thou shall have the right scale and the axis: It is a good practice to check the scale on the vertical axis (usually the quantity) as well as the horizontal axis (timeline) as the results can be made to look very impactful by switching the scales
- Don’t try to answer the “Why is it happening?” question using the time charts as they only show “What is happening”
- Ensure that your time charts should show empty spaces for the times when no data was recorded
- It is good practice to check the scale used for the vertical axis frequency (relative or otherwise), especially when the results are showed down through the use of inappropriate scale
- Ensure that the intervals are not missed on the x or y axis to make the data look smaller
- Ensure the application of histogram is correct as people tend to confuse histograms with a bar graphs
Statistical Blunders Galore
This is probably a ‘no-nonsense zone’ where one would not want to make false assumptions or erroneous selections. Statistical errors can be a costly affair, if not checked or looked into it carefully.
Bias in statistics can be termed as over or underestimating the true value. Below are some most common sources or reasons for such errors.
- Measurement instruments that are systematically off and causing such bias. Example a scale that adds up 5 pounds each time you weigh.
- Survey participants influenced by the questioning techniques
- A Population sample of individuals that doesn’t represent the population of interest. For example, examining exercise habits by only visiting people in gyms will introduce a bias.
No Margin of Error
This is a great way to understand the potential miscalculation or change in circumstance that can result in a sampling error and ensures that the result from a sample study is close to the number that can be expected from the entire population. It is a good idea to always look for this statistics to ensure that the audiences are not left to wonder about the accuracy of the study.
Non-Random samples are biased, and their data cannot be used to represent any other population beyond themselves. It is pivotal to ensure that any study is based on the random sample and if it isn’t, well, you are about to get into big trouble.
Correlation is not Causation
Besides the above statement, correlation is one statistic that has been misused more than being used. Below are the few reasons that makes me believe the misuse part of this statistic.
Correlation applies only to two numerical variables, such as weight and height, call duration and hold time, test scores for a subject and time spent studying that subject etc. So, if you hear someone say, “It appears that the study pattern is correlation with gender,” you know that’s statistically incorrect. Study pattern and gender might have some level of association but they cannot be correlated in the statistical sense.
Correlation helps to measure the strength and the direction of a linear relationship. If the correlation is weak, once can say that there is no linear relationship but that doesn’t mean that there is no other type of relationship that might exist.
One should not believe in everything that appears with statistics. As we know error appears all the time (either by design or by mistake), so look for the below points to ensure that there are no botched numbers.
- Make sure everything adds up to what it is reported to
- “A stitch in time saves nine” – Do not hesitate to double-check the numbers and basic of calculations
- Look at the response rates of a survey – Number of people responded divided by the number of people surveyed
- Question the statistic type used to ensure it is the best fit
Being a consumer of information, it is your job to identify shortcomings within the data and analysis presented to avoid that “oops” moment. Statistics are nothing but simple calculations that are smartly used by people who are either ignorant or don’t want you to catch them to make their story interesting. So, to be a certified skeptic, wear your statistics glasses.
Like this article? Subscribe to our weekly newsletter to never miss out!
Leave a Reply