Dataconomy
  • News
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • DeFi & Blockchain
    • Finance
    • Gaming
    • Startups
    • Tech
  • Industry
  • Research
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Guides
    • Case Studies
    • Glossary
    • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • + More
    • Conversations
    • Events
    • About
      • About
      • Contact
      • Imprint
      • Legal & Privacy
      • Partner With Us
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
  • AI
  • Tech
  • Cybersecurity
  • Finance
  • DeFi & Blockchain
  • Startups
  • Gaming
Dataconomy
  • News
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • DeFi & Blockchain
    • Finance
    • Gaming
    • Startups
    • Tech
  • Industry
  • Research
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Guides
    • Case Studies
    • Glossary
    • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • + More
    • Conversations
    • Events
    • About
      • About
      • Contact
      • Imprint
      • Legal & Privacy
      • Partner With Us
Subscribe
No Result
View All Result
Dataconomy
No Result
View All Result

Artists’ case for copyrights against AI faces uphill battle

Human artists accused AI of copyright infringement, but the case is ongoing with some claims allowed

byEray Eliaçık
November 1, 2023
in News, Artificial Intelligence

Imagine a future where the artists of tomorrow are not only human visionaries but also lines of code and algorithms. This future is upon us, and it has ignited a legal battle that seeks to balance the scales of artistic expression and copyright protection in an era where machines are birthing masterpieces. In the heart of this storm stands U.S. District Court Judge William H. Orrick, who recently delivered a decision that could chart the course for the evolving relationship between AI and art.

This landmark lawsuit, brought before the U.S. District Court, brings three artists into the spotlight: Sarah Anderson, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz. Their accusation is clear and direct: AI art generators using the powerful Stable Diffusion technology have violated their copyrights, often without asking permission, paying, or even mentioning them. The defendants in this high-stakes showdown are Stability AI, Midjourney, and the iconic social platform DeviantArt.

Artists' case for copyrights against AI faces uphill battle
The lawsuit has drawn attention to the critical requirement of artists to register their copyrights with the U.S. Copyright Office, as two of the plaintiffs, McKernan and Ortiz, had failed to do so, which weakened their legal standing (Image credit)

AI art lawsuit breakdown

The lawsuit revolves around a complex issue of artificial intelligence, copyright law, and the creative arts. Here is a detailed explanation of the lawsuit:

Stay Ahead of the Curve!

Don't miss out on the latest insights, trends, and analysis in the world of data, technology, and startups. Subscribe to our newsletter and get exclusive content delivered straight to your inbox.

  • Parties involved: The lawsuit involves three main parties:
    • The Plaintiffs (Artists): Three artists, namely Sarah Anderson, Kelly McKernan, and Karla Ortiz, initiated the legal action. They have accused the defendants of copyright infringement related to their artworks.
    • The Defendants (AI Art Generators): Two entities, Stability AI and Midjourney, are creators of AI art generators that utilize Stable Diffusion technology to transform text into images. A third defendant, DeviantArt, is a popular social network and image sharing service that introduced its own AI image generator, “DreamUp,” using Stable Diffusion technology.
  • Core allegation: The central allegation made by the artists is that AI art generators, including those produced by Stability AI, Midjourney, and DeviantArt, have been infringing upon their copyrights. The artists argue that these AI systems often employ extensive datasets of human-created art to train and generate new artworks. Importantly, this is done without the consent, compensation, or even awareness of the original human artists.
  • The motion to dismiss: In response to the artists’ allegations, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, seeking to have the case thrown out on various legal grounds. The primary objective of the motion was to argue that the lawsuit should not proceed based on the artists’ claims.
  • Key defects in the complaint: The lawsuit faced several challenges due to what the judge deemed to be significant defects in the artists’ complaint:
    • Lack of copyright registration: One crucial issue highlighted in the case was that two of the artists, Kelly McKernan and Karla Ortiz, had not registered copyrights for their artworks with the U.S. Copyright Office. This omission was considered a significant weakness in their claims of copyright infringement.
    • Limited copyright registrations: Sarah Anderson, the third artist involved, had only registered copyrights for a fraction of her extensive body of work. This limitation further diminished the strength of the artists’ claims against the AI art generators.
  • The role of the LAION database:
    • A key point of contention in the lawsuit was the Large-scale Artificial Intelligence Open Network (LAION), an open-source database containing billions of images. LAION was created by computer scientist and machine learning researcher Christoph Schuhmann and his collaborators. All three AI art generator programs under scrutiny relied on LAION as a crucial training resource.
    • The complexity arises from the vast and diverse nature of the LAION database. Judge Orrick emphasized that not every image within LAION could be considered copyrighted material, and not every artwork generated by AI was derived from copyrighted sources. This made it challenging to establish copyright infringement in each specific instance.
  • The Challenge of “Substantial Similarity”: Judge Orrick underscored the requirement for a “substantial similarity” between AI-generated art and the original human-created works to establish copyright infringement. This meant that it was crucial to demonstrate that the AI-generated art predominantly drew from copyrighted material and bore a substantial resemblance to the original works. Without this requisite evidence, copyright infringement claims were unlikely to be upheld.
Artists' case for copyrights against AI faces uphill battle
While the lawsuit faced partial dismissal due to noted defects in the artists’ complaint, it highlights the evolving challenges and debates surrounding AI-generated art, copyright law, and the ongoing quest for creative rights in the digital age (Image credit)

While the lawsuit faced dismissal due to the noted defects, the artists were allowed to amend their claims and refile a more focused lawsuit, specifically citing instances of infringed copyrighted material. Notably, the judge allowed one count to proceed—a direct copyright infringement claim against Stability AI related to Sarah Anderson’s 16 copyrighted works.

In summary, this lawsuit highlights the intricate and evolving challenges at the intersection of AI-generated art and copyright law. It emphasizes the need for continual adaptation in legal frameworks to address the unique complexities presented by AI in the realm of creative arts. While the lawsuit faced partial dismissal, it underscores the unresolved issues and ongoing debates in the evolving landscape of AI-generated art and copyright jurisprudence.

Featured image credit: Tingey Injury Law Firm

Tags: AIcopyrightlawsuit

Related Posts

Shinyhunters extorts Red Hat over stolen CER data

Shinyhunters extorts Red Hat over stolen CER data

October 7, 2025
CPAP breach exposes data of 90k military members

CPAP breach exposes data of 90k military members

October 7, 2025
Windows 11 test build blocks local account bypass

Windows 11 test build blocks local account bypass

October 7, 2025
Excel gets AI agent mode for automated data tasks

Excel gets AI agent mode for automated data tasks

October 7, 2025
What is new at iOS 26.1 beta 2?

What is new at iOS 26.1 beta 2?

October 7, 2025
ChatGPT reaches 800m weekly active users

ChatGPT reaches 800m weekly active users

October 7, 2025

LATEST NEWS

Shinyhunters extorts Red Hat over stolen CER data

CPAP breach exposes data of 90k military members

Windows 11 test build blocks local account bypass

Excel gets AI agent mode for automated data tasks

What is new at iOS 26.1 beta 2?

ChatGPT reaches 800m weekly active users

Dataconomy

COPYRIGHT © DATACONOMY MEDIA GMBH, ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

  • About
  • Imprint
  • Contact
  • Legal & Privacy

Follow Us

  • News
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cybersecurity
    • DeFi & Blockchain
    • Finance
    • Gaming
    • Startups
    • Tech
  • Industry
  • Research
  • Resources
    • Articles
    • Guides
    • Case Studies
    • Glossary
    • Whitepapers
  • Newsletter
  • + More
    • Conversations
    • Events
    • About
      • About
      • Contact
      • Imprint
      • Legal & Privacy
      • Partner With Us
No Result
View All Result
Subscribe

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. Visit our Privacy Policy.