Google recently thwarted OpenAI’s potential $3 billion acquisition of AI startup Windsurf by instead hiring key personnel and licensing its technology, a tactic observers term a “non-acquisition acquisition” or “acqui-hire.” This occurred on July 11, with Google reportedly paying $2.4 billion to secure top Windsurf employees, including its CEO, and obtain a non-exclusive license for its technology, according to Bloomberg.
This strategy allowed Google to neutralize OpenAI’s momentum and gain access to Windsurf’s AI technology without a full company acquisition. The maneuver represents a growing trend among major technology companies seeking to enhance competitive advantage in the artificial intelligence sector.
OpenAI, responsible for ChatGPT, initiated the current AI development surge in 2022 and has maintained a leading position in generative AI. However, its market standing faces increasing challenges from competitors such as Google and Meta. The demand for elite AI engineers has become a critical factor in this competitive landscape.
OpenAI has recently become a primary target for talent acquisition. Following a series of notable raids by Meta, OpenAI executives conveyed feeling as though “someone has broken into our home and stolen something,” as detailed in an internal memo obtained by WIRED. Meta has been particularly active in this new phase of talent acquisition, often referred to as “poaching wars.” In April 2025, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg acknowledged that the company had fallen behind in the AI competition. This admission led to a multi-billion-dollar investment in strategic talent recruitment.
Meta subsequently hired Alexandr Wang, CEO of ScaleAI; Ruoming Pang, Apple’s senior AI specialist; and Nat Friedman, former CEO of Microsoft-owned GitHub. The company also recruited multiple high-ranking OpenAI employees through multi-year agreements valued at millions of dollars. This newly assembled talent is being integrated into Meta Superintelligence Labs, a new division focused on developing AI superintelligence.
Microsoft and Amazon executed similar acqui-hire transactions in the preceding year. Microsoft recruited top personnel from AI startup Inflection, including co-founder Mustafa Suleyman, who now heads Microsoft’s AI division. Amazon secured co-founders and other senior talent from the AI agent startup Adept. Google has also previously engaged in similar practices, having executed an acqui-hire deal approximately a year prior with Character.AI. This agreement granted Google a non-exclusive license to Character.AI’s large language model (LLM) technology, and the startup’s two co-founders joined Google.
The rise of acqui-hires indicates a revised strategy for large technology firms to expand market dominance while circumventing antitrust scrutiny. This approach has emerged during a period of heightened regulatory pressure, particularly under former Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chairwoman Lina Khan, whose administration focused on alleged anti-competitive practices within the AI industry. Both Meta and Google are currently under intense examination by the FTC. Meta awaits a verdict in an antitrust trial concerning the FTC’s claim that it maintains a monopoly in social media.
Google has faced numerous antitrust setbacks in the past year, accused of monopolistic practices in internet search and online advertising. The company is awaiting the final results of a trial that could potentially mandate the divestiture of its Chrome browser. Early last year, under Khan’s leadership, the FTC initiated an investigation into Microsoft, Amazon, and Google regarding their investments in AI startups OpenAI and Anthropic. Amidst this regulatory environment, acqui-hiring has presented a method for major technology companies to acquire technology and research talent from AI startups without undergoing the formal acquisition review processes.
The current FTC, led by Trump-appointed Chairman Andrew Ferguson, now faces the responsibility of defining its position on this practice. While Ferguson is not perceived as having the same hardline stance against Big Tech as Khan, he has largely continued the previous administration’s investigations, even as President Trump has engaged with Silicon Valley leaders.
