When it comes to marketing a product, Amazon ratings can make or break a business. I’ve lost count of the times I’ve been talked in to (or out of) buying a product based on a passionate review or a high or low rating. Nithyanand Kota spent alot of time contemplating the significance of Amazon ratings, asking questions such as: Can a user actually differentiate between 1 and 2 star ratings? And why do certain items have bipolar ratings- is someone gaming the system or is it a politically charged item?
So began Kota’s “fishing expedition” in to Amazon rating analysis. For his research, Kota used the Amazon Annual Bestseller list, which contains the 100 best selling books on amazon for the past 19 years (beginning in 1995).
Here are some of his more interesting findings:
1. 2-Star Ratings Are Pretty Uncommon:
Complete our SAP x Data Natives CDO Club survey now, and help us to help you
The most interesting finding in this graph of normalized ratings is the relative lack of 2-star ratings. Kota attributes to this to ‘the nature of internet feedback’- we’re more likely to take to the internet to give an extremely disdainful 1-star review than a mildly disappointed 2-star review.
2. Amazon Ratings (and Maybe Internet Book Sales on the Whole) Are Still on the Rise
The number of ratings given per year is on the up, perhaps indicating internet book sales are continuing to climb too. As Kota notes: ‘One can also analyze the total number of ratings given for books in the list (for each year) as a function of the year. This metric serves as a proxy for number of people buying books over internet.’
3. 9/11 Had a Noticeable Affect On Literature Consumption
Looking at the same graph, you’ll notice two obvious dips. One is for 2013, which Kota assumes is due to the fact the titles are newer and therefore less widely-read and reviewed, and this should correct over time. The other dip, completely disrupting the otherwise monotonic increase, Kota attributes to a ‘post 9/11 reading lull’.
4. Everyone Loves Dr Seuss- But Opinion is Split on Tom Clancy, JK Rowling and John Grisham
Kota’s table of the worst-rated best sellers of each year features some pretty big names, including Rowling, Grisham and Clancy. Kota poses the possibility that so many novels end up on this list because fans of novelists lack the ‘religious zeal’ of fans of political/spiritual books, and are less likely to take to the ratings board to defend their favourite works against the detractors.
The best-rated bestsellers list is alot less diverse- which makes sense, as you would assume highly-rated bestsellers would continue to sell well after the year of publication, and continue to garner positive reviews from new readers. Dr Seuss’s ‘Oh, The Places You’ll Go!’ appears as the highest-rated bestseller on five seperate ocassions. Whereas the lowest-rated table was dominated by novels for adults, the highest-rated is mainly populated by children’s and young adult fiction, as well religious publications.
5. Controversy and Poor Ratings Go Hand-in-Hand
Kota created a Controversy Index, given by C.I=(number of 5 star votes /number of 1 star votes)+(number of 1 star votes /number of 5 star votes). C.I is of the form x+1/x and can obtain a minimum value of 2 for a positive x.
Above is a table of the books that most divided opinion for each year. Kota assumed on campaign/election years, the most controversial books would be political- but this is only the case for 2002 and 2004. Indeed, some of the most divisive titles are considered modern classics, such as Joyce Carol Oates’ We Were the Mulvaneys– and, of course, Pride and Prejudice and Zombies.
Also, in four of the years (2006, 2008, 2012 and 2013) the most controversial bestseller was also the worst-rated bestseller- suggesting being controversial and divisive isn’t necassarily healthy for your ratings.
You can find out more about Kota’s study here.
Interested in more content like this? Sign up to our newsletter, and you wont miss a thing!